3 Comments

  1. When looking from the side, the drawing is almost like the story of trying to escape from the heavy weight of the ground. As you ascend and ascend, it follows you, as it’s trying to pull you inside. But as its original placement, space is dependant on that heavy line to keep it from falling off the edge. Space and anti-space become one and hanged to the bottom of the topography line. The gravity is as if it’s turned upside down. The spatial quality is effortful but worth the adventure.

    Like

    1. it is the plan of an architecture which leans against a mountain and creates a passage through it. So architecture and nature mingle. I think you described my drawing better than I would have.

      Like

  2. Language, the symbols that drawing uses to communicate— which, as we’ve seen, are a fundamental component of the architectural survey—are the bearers of a message. I think the black painted parts we see in the drawing immediately trigger a message in the minds of us architects, this is a cross section. The first thing I thought was whether the paper was crooked, or I am followed by rotating sections but maybe someone else could interpret it as the difference between dark and light when looking at this drawing. It can also be creative when the receiver gets a message different from the one that was sent. “Perceptual misunderstanding”can be just as meaningful and helpful as correct understanding the meaning.

    Like

Leave a comment